The terms ‘globalised’ and ‘globalisation’ are in well-known usage in both academia and the media to an extent that they're taken like a given, rather than questioned. Right here the extent to which we are living in a ‘globalised’ globe is challenged. In most effortless terms to globalise is ‘to make global or worldwide in scope or application’ (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/globalised accessed 10/03/09). Taking this uncomplicated definition the essay proceeds to show how the globe we live in is far from globalised. In substantiating this argument it draws upon the imbalance in wealth in between the formulated as well as the lesser formulated world, arguing that far from being globalised the globe is stratified. It also considered the Western dominance of international affairs as well as the clash of cultures as aspects of the world we live in that indicate it's far from like a globalised one.
Globalisation and the thought of a globalised world normally refers to an elevated interconnectivity in between peoples and places inside the world, via increased ease of travel and of passage of data through development of travel and data communications technologies and primarily from the advent from the world wide web and the homogenisation of cultures and ideas, of society, yet the world we live in these days is far from homogenised. Inside the so named global village we live in in which cultures have converged, visible through the existed of McDonalds, Starbucks or Coca Cola on every corner of each city 1 may possibly travel to. It's this that has prompted speculation how the world wherever we are living in is globalised. This could not be further inside the truth. Although unscrupulous multi-national firms have taken advantage of poorer economies, placing production sites wherever costs are lower and have employed elevated ease of transportation to ship all over the world, this does not quantity to a global society.
Best outlines that you'll find 3 aspects to globalisation economic, cultural and political. (2001: 167) Economic from the transnational businesses who buy countries other than those people of origin and ship merchandise globally; cultural from your ‘homogenisation’ of cultures, convergence of cultures and awareness of cultural difference from the increased facts about different cultures. There's also the argument of ‘McDonaldisation’. Politically there is the United Nations, the IMF and summits for instance the G8 in terms of global governance. On the other hand all of these have been Western in concept and in origin, arguably a Western imperialism in an additional guise. Whilst we may perhaps all live on a same planet, wherever we live over a world determines our experience and options. In a globalised globe this would not be the case.
One on the clearest ways to determine just that the world we live in just isn't globalised will be the vast disparity of wealth between the countries from the world. In terms of wealth the disparity among rich and poor nations of the world, of the global village we supposedly live in, has only grown. The map of the globe below, from the United Nations Development Programme in accordance with the Gini coefficient clearly shows the preponderance of wealth as well as the inequality that exists. ‘The Gini coefficient is often a measure of money inequality that ranges between 0, indicating perfect equality, and 1, indicating complete inequality.’ (UNDP, 2003: 39)
The report continues to note that the ‘richest 5% on the world’s folks receive 114 times the money from the poorest 5%. The richest 1% receive as much as the poorest 57%.’ (UNDP, 2003: 39) Cleary economically the world we are living in is not globalised, it is unjust. To return on the easy definition of what it is to globalise wealth has not been created worldwide in scope or application, that is not the situation in the distribution of wealth.
Another generally cited aspect of globalisation and also the concept that we are over ever living inside a global village is improve in details communications technologies and particularly the advent of the internet. Whilst it is not questioned the there has been growth in this area as the chart below taken during the United Countries Development Programme Human Development Report (UNDP, 2001: 32) clearly shows.
However the use from the web is never a global phenomenon, at least not on an equitable level. The chart below clearly shows the use of new information communications technologies is primarily inside the Western created world. As a result in this sense the Western globe possibly far more connected, but in terms of the global village, this is clearly not the case.
In terms of society and cultural homogenisation, the later component with the twentieth century and also the begin in the twenty-first century conflict upon ethnic lines has been rife (see Booth and Dunne, 2002) as Huntingdon famously prophesised in a ‘Clash of Civilisations’. (1992) The ongoing conflict between Palestine and Israel, intra-state conflict of ethnic cleansing in Bosnia and parts of Africa are symptomatic of the clashes of cultural difference. Nonetheless it was the attacks of September 11th that remain marked as defining with the begin from the twenty-first century and symbolic of Huntingdon’s thesis. The subsequent ‘threat’ of terror perpetuated and felt inside the Western world shows both how media is also used to communicate fear and to segregate and divide, and thus how divided the world extremely is. (See Halliday, 2002) The recent ‘terrorist threat’ is also observed being a response towards the hegemony of Western cultural imperialism. The attack of 9/11 was on The us and symbolically on the World Trade Centre – the name in the building itself betrays a grandiose view of self-importance, how the US will be the head of World Trade and for the injustices that exist in monetary terms and in trading agreements across the world. The differences among cultures only heighten from the media and also the ease of communications.
This essay has highlighted in the stark contrast in wealth how in economic terms the globe we live in is far from globalised, in terms of society the clash of cultures, of difference and intolerance indicate we are far removed from a global society and in terms of politics there is no overall global governance, while institutions for example the United Nations as well as the IMF are in part fulfilling the role at present, they too nevertheless can be observed as types of Western dominance. The view from the world as a global village appears 1 that's extremely far within the modern day reality. Inside Western designed globe we live in there is increased connectivity in terms of travel, communications and business, metaphorically speaking the world has come to be a a lot small place. Yet in terms of equality, of wealth, opportunity and health in the world as one, the world in which we live is far from getting globalised, rather it's stratified, as Marx set forth, between those who have and those who do not.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment