Analyzing A Research Report From The Media

The media is an important resource that puke be utilized to buzz off greater aw arness to fond issues and breeding . However , it can also be a resource that can be ab utilisationd and mis utilize , especially when the teaching presented is non only true . Information that is misrepresented is misleading and will not be of help to those who receives the information , on the other dedicate information released through the media should be objective , validated and verify and learns the discipline of academic and scientific investigation . As consumers of media information , it is important that we must be critical about the things that we turn around and see especially if it purports to effect change An example of a media answer for that is guilty of information misrepresentation is a continue entitled Television Violence : A Re enamour of the effects on Children of Different Ages by Wendy Josephson (1995 released by the Media Aw atomic number 18ness mesh topology and the Department of Canadian Heritage . The declare specifically attempts to win evidence of how wildness depicted in tv sets is affecting children from babyhood to adolescence . The report also includes information and suggestions on how parents could intervene in the viewing habits of their children as well as how the television computer programing should be done . The report may contract had superb intentions entirely the problem with the report is that it only compiled data and information from existing reports and studies and from that hodge-podge of articles created this comprehensive reportThis report did not level follow the required format for research reports . She did not made denotation of the methods that she used to complete the research , the research design and even the participants or the kind of materials she used for the research was not understandably identified (Pyrczak Bruce , 2005 . The approach of the author was to build her own arguments and thesis from the details of the articles that she had researched . She did take hold arguably sound observations basically culled from the principles of developmental psychology and the cognitive stages . However , instead of providing evidence in her interventions , she used material after material from secondary and first sources and weaving them to imparther to create her own preachingThe article is change with examples and instances that was derived from a number of researches that she had used to make her report , in that respect was no immature information to support or fight down the points that she was trying to dissect . She relied heavily on old reports and textbooks which in a very fluid and changing world of media and social awareness seems to be old news . What was counterproductive was her use of footnotes she only made mention of the author or the advocate of the theory or the author of the research and when read , and it appeared as if it was her own words . There is nada wrong with employ secondary data , however it should not be used to fit in with the argument but only to put up support or provide an opposing point of view . Secondary data should also be used meagerly , only when necessary or when the original data or research is not available (Orcher , 2005 . In sum , the report lacks the kind of credibility that is necessary for a report of this order . To the non-initiated readers , the report may appear as truth and all-encompassing , but when one reads it in its entirety , the report is roaring , it has not much substance as there is nothing in the report to validate her arguments . She made mention of how television violence affects children negatively but in her conclusions she says that research have not confirmed whether television violence do aim aggressive behavior in children . The information she presented are not convincing enough as she speaks in general foothold , for example she says that preschool children have conflicting views on palpableity and a study reported that a child says that cartoons are real because they have refrigerators .

She could have provided more semiempirical studies to support the discussion of the concept of reality in young children instead of assuming that every reader understands the cognitive processes in young children (Babbie , 2004The report by Josephson (1995 ) is actually not a report but a term (Leedy Ormrod , 2005 she was not reporting on anything new or significant , she was presenting a summary of various articles link up to the of television violence and children . The discussion on how infants are not actually processing information in television because they have a limited attention span is obvious and if not is an information that can be called common sense , since everybody receive that infants because of their immature cognitive abilities cannot quite grasp the concept of a television show . She did include a section on criticisms about the research on television violence and incursion and have even mentioned that studies relevant to the question of the effects of TV violence to children was the only materials considered in her report , then go on to say that there is proof that TV violence causes increased aggression and that scholars who are not convinced are in a minority . In an analysis of this mastery , it is natural that of the studies used in this report , few authors assemble no evidence to support the conclusion , because she had already been dark-skinned with the kind of studies she chose to use . She also substantiated this conclusion with the several domain positions of several interest groups and organizations which is in favor of TV monitor , parental guidance and censorship , which one could say are positive because it is a reality that television shows are important and parents should be aware of the need to monitor and guide their children on what shows to watch . Thus the report is flawed because it does not extend objective data from sound research , it relied heavily on secondary data and it did not provide an unbiased discussion of theReferencesBabbie , E (2004 . The Practice of kindly Research 10th ed . Belmont CA : WadsworthLeedy ,Ormrod , J (2005 . Practical Research : Planning and anatomy 8th edUpper Saddle River , NJ : Pearson Prentice-HallOrcher , L (2005 . Conducting research : Social and behavioral science methods . GlendaleCA : Pyrczak PublishingPyrczak , F Bruce , R (2005 . Writing empirical research reports 3rd ed . Glendale , CAPyrczak Publishing ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .